comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: catholic church
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Showing posts with label catholic church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catholic church. Show all posts

Former Cardinal: Catholic Church "200 years out of date"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
(And don't misss John on CNN taking about the conventions at 11:30 AM Eastern time on Howie Kurtz's Reliable Sources.)

From the excerpts, it sounds as though at least one person in the church had a clue. Not being a knuckle-dragger must have made him highly unpopular inside the Vatican.
Martini, once favoured by Vatican progressives to succeed Pope John Paul II and a prominent voice in the church until his death at the age of 85 on Friday, gave a scathing portrayal of a pompous and bureaucratic church failing to move with the times.

"Our culture has aged, our churches are big and empty and the church bureaucracy rises up, our rituals and our cassocks are pompous," Martini said in the interview published in Italian daily Corriere della Sera.

"The Church must admit its mistakes and begin a radical change, starting from the pope and the bishops. The paedophilia scandals oblige us to take a journey of transformation," he said in the interview.
Read the rest of this post...

Catholic Church leader says child rape "understandable," blames children



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
So absolutely disgusting. And sadly typical. They should all be in jail.

Via Andrew Sullivan's blog we hear from Father Benedict Groeschel, the director of the Office for Spiritual Development for the Catholic Archdiocese of New York:
People have this picture in their minds of a person planning to — a psychopath. But that's not the case. Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer ... It's not so hard to see — a kid looking for a father and didn't have his own — and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping but not having intercourse or anything like that.

It's an understandable thing ... there are the relatively rare cases where a priest is involved in a homosexual way with a minor. I think the statistic I read recently in a secular psychology review was about 2%. Would that be true of other clergy? Would it be true of doctors, lawyers, coaches?

Here's this poor guy — [Penn State football coach Jerry] Sandusky — it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn't anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn't break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn't think of it in terms of legal things.
Most of us don't find child rape "interesting." But then again, most of us don't run the Catholic church.

And they're still making excuses for child rapists, while telling the rest of us how to live.  Newsflash: I don't take moral advice from men who rape, and aid and abet, the rape of small children.

Absolutely disgusting.

Even better: The National Catholic Register is now apologizing for publishing the accurate comments of the church leader.  They're suggesting he may have lost his mind.  Right, because no Catholic leader has ever tried to blame the victim or excuse the rape of children. Read the rest of this post...

Catholic cardinal to give benediction at his church's convention (that'd be the GOP)



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Like this is new. The Catholic church hopped in bed with the Republicans long ago.  I'm surprised we haven't yet heard of them cutting off communion to Democratic lawmakers - election year is their usual cue to try to swing the election to the Republicans.  It's like they don't even try anymore to pretend they're non-partisan, let alone simply an appendage of the Republican party (the religious equivalent of Fox News - all spin, little truth).

We always joke about how the Republican party would freak out if Jesus "that socialist hippy" actually came back.  But I'm starting to wonder if the reaction from the Catholic church, or their buddies in the religious right, would be any different.  Because last time I checked, Jesus never took hostages.

He never turned a blind eye to the rape of children either. Read the rest of this post...

Ryan jokes and laughs as 71-year-old is forced to the ground



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
I'm stealing Diane Sweet's headline (she posted this recently at Crooks & Liars) — because mine was far more editorial:
"VoucherCare Ryan" shows his Republican true colors:
Conscienceless & cruel (Granny, you're next)
Call this "burying the head" — I couldn't make myself put that up front.

But I swear to god, there's something really off about these people. Something do to with empathy I think. Dunno, maybe it's an anti-Christian thing.

Anyway, thanks to Diane for resurrecting this. Enjoy the full flavor of the man:



Diane's take:
This took place last fall at one of Congressman Rep. Ryan’s “Pay to Play” town hall meetings where he was discussing cutting Senior’s Social Security, and Medicare as a means of debt reduction. As you might imagine, one senior was not pleased.
Indeed.

But that's not the worst. Is Ryan Opus Dei, like Scalia and Thomas are rumored to be? If so, I could care less about your taxes, sir. Show me the marks from that torture-belt you guys wear.

That's right, Paul — I want to see what makes you think you're a Christian. Got scars? 'Cause otherwise I can't figure it out.

Your friend in you-know-who (seriously),

GP

To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius
  Read the rest of this post...

Pope no longer opposed to condoms, kind of



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Good, but at the same time, whatever. Telegraph:
After decades of fierce opposition to the use of all contraception, the Pontiff has ended the Church’s absolute ban on the use of condoms.

He said it was acceptable to use a prophylactic when the sole intention was to “reduce the risk of infection” from Aids.

While he restated the Catholic Church’s staunch objections to contraception because it believes that it interferes with the creation of life, he argued that using a condom to preserve life and avoid death could be a responsible act – even outside marriage.
This part was a bit odd:
“There may be justified individual cases, for example when a male prostitute uses a condom, where this can be … a first bit of responsibility, to redevelop the understanding that not everything is permitted and that one may not do everything one wishes.

“But it is not the proper way to deal with the horror of HIV infection.”
The one concrete example is a male prostitute?  Uh ok. Read the rest of this post...

Catholic church laments prison term for pedophile-enabler



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
From the NYT:
Monsignor Lynn served as secretary for clergy for the 1.5 million-member archdiocese from 1992 to 2004, recommending priest assignments and investigating abuse complaints. During the trial, prosecutors presented evidence that he had shielded predatory priests, sometimes transferring them to unwary parishes, and lied to the public to avoid bad publicity and lawsuits.
He got three to six years.  Classic statement from the Catholic church:
In a statement Tuesday, the Archdiocese of Philadelphia said that its procedures for protecting children had improved significantly since “the events some 10 years ago that were at the center of this trial.”

It acknowledged “legitimate anger in the broad community toward any incident or enabling of sexual abuse.” But it also described the sentence as overly harsh, saying “fair-minded people will question the severity.”

“We hope that when this punishment is objectively reviewed, it will be adjusted,” it said.
So how much jail time is appropriate for aiding and abetting the rape of children?  Any?

And here's another question: Why is this guy still a Catholic priest at all? He appeared in court in his full priestly garb. They still haven't fired him? Boy if he was gay they'd have gotten rid of him immediately. As we've noted repeatedly, the Catholic Church simply doesn't value the safety of young children. Read the rest of this post...

Indian Catholics try to throw man in jail for doubting "sign from God"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
If only the Catholics were so quick about throwing pedophiles in jail.

Via Slate:
Sanal Edamaruku faces a Catholic backlash after insisting that the "holy" water dripping from a statue of Christ in Mumbai, India, came from a leaky drain.
You now face possible arrest. Why?

Leaders of two Catholic laity organizations have launched charges against me under Section 295A of the Indian penal code. This charges a person with "deliberately hurting religious feelings and attempting malicious acts intended to outrage the religious sentiments of any class or community.” It is absurd to claim that I did anything of the sort.
Read the rest of this post...

Pope fires bishop over "administrative issues"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Yet covering up child rape is still OK for the Vatican. Though this latest firing is completely different from the numerous child rape scandals within the Catholic church, there are implications for those cases.
In the face of U.S. lawsuits seeking to hold the pope ultimately responsible for abusive priests, the Holy See has argued that bishops are largely masters of their dioceses and that the pope doesn't really control them. The Vatican has thus sought to limit its own liability, arguing that the pope doesn't exercise sufficient control over the bishops to be held responsible for their bungled response to priests who rape children.

The ability of the pope to actively fire bishops, and not just passively accept their resignations, would seem to undercut the Vatican's argument of a hands-off pope.

"If the pope can fire a bishop, that implies he's their supervisor," said Nick Cafardi, a U.S. canon lawyer and former chairman of the U.S. bishops' lay review board that monitored clerical abuse. "This will invite more lawsuits attempting to sue the pope in American courts."
Read the rest of this post...

Vatican hires Fox News Opus Dei adherent for PR help



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
That's one way to address the Vatican's PR problem.

Here's another: Stop raping children, and start siding with the kids and not their rapists.

(It also wouldn't hurt if the Vatican got its head out of the 15th century, but no one expects that to happen any time soon.  So perhaps in the meantime having a more enlightened perspective on the subject of child-rape might help.) Read the rest of this post...

Catholic Monsignor convicted in Philly abuse case



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
On the same day as Jerry Sandusky was found guilty on 45 counts, the archdiocese of Philadelphia also received a strong verdict. Many had expected more in this case, but it is still a groundbreaking decision. Covering up crimes may now be viewed differently following this case.
A jury convicted Msgr. William J. Lynn of child endangerment Friday, finding that as the Archdiocese of Philadelphia secretary for clergy, he ignored credible warning signs about a priest who later sexually assaulted a 10-year-old altar boy.

The verdict, after a three-month trial, marked the first time since the clergy sex-abuse scandal erupted nationally a decade ago that a Catholic Church supervisor had been found criminally liable for child-sex crimes by a priest.

Common Pleas Court Judge M. Teresa Sarmina immediately revoked Lynn's bail, and deputy sheriffs escorted the white-haired monsignor to a holding cell. Lynn faces up to seven years in prison, and prosecutors vowed to seek a term near the maximum.
In the Sandusky case, there was brief mention of an appeal, though that sounds unlikely. What sounds much more likely is even more trouble for Penn State who is being sued for covering up the scandal, not unlike what we saw in the Philadelphia church trial.

Having just spent a week in the Philadelphia area, I was floored with number of people who minimized the scandal. Too many people limited the story to Sandusky rather than the the school administration as well as the legendary Joe Paterno. There were plenty of people who were as disgusted as most outside of Pennsylvania but the continued support for Paterno was too much.

I know how irrational college football fans can be (my school is right up there with Penn State, Michigan and Notre Dame fans in terms of being irrational and sometimes delusional) but wow, the inability to see the depths of this problem was amazing. Perhaps the next round of civil lawsuits against the school and individuals may change some opinions, or at least I hope that's what happens. But then again, there are still plenty of supporters of the Catholic church despite the global child rape problems. Read the rest of this post...

82% of Catholics say birth control is morally acceptable



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
That means the Catholic church doesn't speak for most Catholics on a key doctrine of modern-day Catholicism.

The Catholic church doesn't represent a majority of Catholics on issue after issue.  At some point, someone is going to wise up and realize that if the church doesn't even represent a majority of its own faithful, then who exactly is it speaking on behalf of when it keeps throwing its weight around on issue after issue in American politics?

Answer: The Republican party.

The serial rape of children really does take it toll on one's moral authority. Read the rest of this post...

Archdiocese of Milwaukee paid off child rapist priests to go away



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It's nice to see that the Catholic church has been so consistent across borders when it comes to sweeping violations of the law under the carpet. We've seen the same thing happen in Belgium and Ireland, where instead of following the law and reporting rapists, they opted out and took matters into their own hands.

In the case of Milwaukee, the local archdiocese paid off child rapist priests instead of contacting the police. Why does the Catholic church continue telling others what is moral when they so often are wrong and in violation of the law themselves?

Despite previous denials (we can now call them "lies") current New York Cardinal Timothy Doland's Milwaukee archdiocese was deeply involved in this scandal. Why was that acceptable to the church before and why did they elevate him to Cardinal when they had to know what was going on? Now that we know he lied about paying off rapists, shouldn't he be stepping down? Or are lies OK when it's a senior member of the Catholic church?

More on the latest disgusting coverup of rapists at the NY Times:
Questioned at the time about the news that one particularly notorious pedophile cleric had been given a “payoff” to leave the priesthood, Cardinal Dolan, then the archbishop, responded that such an inference was “false, preposterous and unjust.”

But a document unearthed during bankruptcy proceedings for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee and made public by victims’ advocates reveals that the archdiocese did make such payments to multiple accused priests to encourage them to seek dismissal, thereby allowing the church to remove them from the payroll.

A spokesman for the archdiocese confirmed on Wednesday that payments of as much as $20,000 were made to “a handful” of accused priests “as a motivation” not to contest being defrocked. The process, known as “laicization,” is a formal church juridical procedure that requires Vatican approval, and can take far longer if the priest objects.
Read the rest of this post...

Why do the Romneys think that Catholics aren't good enough Christians?



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Mitt Romney says he's the great defender of the Catholic faith, and chose to wear his "pro-Catholicism" on his sleeve in order to bash President Obama over the recent contraceptive policy controversy.

It's therefore interesting that both Mitt Romney and his son have tried in the past to convert Catholics to Mormonism.  It's not exactly a stellar way to show how much you want to save Catholicism, by wiping it out.

Here's some of what I wrote about in an earlier post:
Mitt Romney's son went to South America to convert Latino Christians away from Catholicism and to Mormonism. Mitt Romney himself went to France in the early 1970s to, again, convert the French from Christianity - Catholicism, again, in their case - to Mormonism.

It's interesting that the Mormons bristle at the suggestion that they are not Christians, yet they do not seem to consider Catholics Christian enough to be exempt from Mormon attempts at conversion. After all, why would Catholics need to be converted to Mormonism, in order to be saved, if in fact we're all Christians?

Those are the kind of questions Mitt Romney would ask of Barack Obama if the Mormon shoe were on the other foot. But no one dares ask Mitt Romney the very type of questions he has himself posed to President Obama.

If Mitt Romney thinks Reverend Wright is fair game - an attack that many consider thinly-veiled racism - then isn't it at least fair to inquire why Mitt Romney and his son believe that Catholics are lesser Christians than Mormons?
I know that when I was in the Russian Far East in the early 1990s, and saw evangelical Christians proselytizing in the local Petropavlovsk airport, apparently to convert the "heathen" Orthodox Christians (of which I am a member) to the "only true" Christianity, I was supremely offended. Not simply that they considered my faith inferior, but that they knew we were Christians, just like they were, yet they still had the nerve to treat us like we were some kind of savage jungle tribe that needed saving.

Now that Mitt Romney has gone on the record as wanting to be president so he can defend the Catholic faith, it's relevant for us to have a discussion of just how good a defender of the Catholic faith Mitt Romney really is.

And judging by his, and his son's, efforts to convert Catholics to Mormonism in multiple countries, Romney's record in defending Catholicism isn't all that great. Read the rest of this post...

Pope's butler arrested for leaking Vatican letters exposing alleged corruption



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Will it never end? Will no one high in the Vatican every pay for their crimes?

Note: The arrestee is a whistleblower, not the original (alleged) corruption perps, and the cops making the bust are Vatican, not Italian, police. Of course.

The Guardian:
The pope's butler has been arrested by Vatican police on suspicion of leaking a large number of confidential letters addressed to Benedict XVI which have lifted the lid on alleged corruption and nepotism at the Holy See. ...

The arrest comes a month after the Vatican gave an investigative team led by Cardinal Julian Herranz, a member of Opus dei, a full "pontifical mandate" to join Vatican police in rooting out the perpetrators of what has been dubbed Vatileaks. ...

Among the most serious leaks published this year are in a letter from Carlo Maria Viganò, the deputy governor of Vatican City, denouncing inflated contracts with friendly companies, false invoicing and missing cash.

Further revelations were published this week in a book by a journalist, Gianluigi Nuzzi, who described how an unnamed whistleblower sent emissaries to sound him out before they held secret meetings in an unfurnished, rented flat near the Vatican. "I wore a USB round my neck for six months with the leaked documents on it," Nuzzi told the Guardian. "It was like something out of a film." In the book, the source says he was coming clean because "hypocrisy within the Vatican goes unchallenged and scandals multiply". ...
There's more; this is Ratzinger's Vatican. The list of allegations in the article is stunning.

Inflated contracts? Missing cash? Gay smears? And for good measure, this:
Letters depict collusion between the Berlusconi government and the Vatican over how to avoid EU pressure to make the Catholic church pay tax on its properties.
How ... secular.

UPDATE: Howie Klein adds this, "What Is It With Child Rape And Organized Religion?" at Down With Tyranny. It isn't just Catholics who cover crimes to protect "their own."

GP

(To follow on Twitter or to send links: @Gaius_Publius) Read the rest of this post...

Catholic church threatens to turn away non-Catholics from emergency rooms



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Get these people out of the hospital business, now.

The Catholic church is now making rumblings about turning away non-Catholics from the emergency rooms of Catholic hospitals. I shudder to make a Nazi analogy, so I won't. But what other analogy is there for a hospital to even dare start talking about picking and choosing who lives and who dies based on their religion?

Welcome to the Vatican death panels.

Don't anyone think for a moment that this isn't a veiled threat of what's to come.

Remember, the Catholic church warned that it would have to stop foster care and adoption services in Washington, DC and Illinois, rather than abide with anti-discrimination laws, and what did they do?  They stopped providing those services in those states.  The Catholic bishops are nothing if not consistent when it comes to following through on their threats to harm their human shields.

What's to stop them from turning away non-Catholics from the emergency rooms of Catholic hospitals - which they just threatened in writing, mind you? These are people who excel at punishing innocent victims, be it a raped five year old or a homeless teenager.

From Maureen Dowd, writing about the latest Catholic scare tactic, distributed in tax-exempt churches, to oppose President Obama's new contraceptive policy that Mitt Romney previously endorsed as well.
The Archdiocese of Washington put an equally alarmist message in the church bulletins at Sunday’s Masses, warning of apocalyptic risk:

“1. Our more than 600 hospitals nationwide, which will need to stop non-Catholics at the emergency room door and say, ‘We are only allowed by the government to heal Catholics.’
The poor oppressed Catholic church.  So oppressed that they get $2.8 billion of taxpayer money every year from the US government.

Call them "God's 1%."

As Dowd reminds us, the Catholic bishops don't really speak for actual American Catholics.  Note the gay polling, below.
I wasn’t surprised to see the Gallup poll Tuesday showing that 82 percent of U.S. Catholics say birth control is morally acceptable. (Eighty-nine percent of all Americans and 90 percent of non-Catholics agreed.) Gallup tested the morality of 18 issues, and birth control came out on top as the most acceptable, beating divorce, which garnered 67 percent approval, and “buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur,” which got a 60 percent thumbs-up (more from Republicans, naturally, than Democrats).

Polygamy, cloning humans and having an affair took the most morally offensive spots on the list. “Gay or lesbian relations” tied “having a baby outside of marriage,” with 54 percent approving. That’s in the middle of the list, above a 38 percent score for abortion and below a 59 percent score for “sex between an unmarried man and woman.”
All they speak for is a Vatican that every four years tries to throw the American election to the Republicans. Read the rest of this post...

The latest move by the Catholic bishops to help the GOP win the election



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Don't think for a minute that this isn't about the election. From EJ Dionne:
The federal lawsuits filed Monday by Catholic institutions against the contraception mandate under the health care law are not surprising, but they are unfortunate. The Bishops’ Conference and many — though not all — Catholic organizations are acting as if the Obama Administration had never backed down from its original, broad mandate and had never offered to negotiate.

But the administration, responding to a broadly united Catholic community, did offer a compromise and has since shown a willingness to try to accommodate many of the concerns of Catholic and other religious institutions. Now the Catholic community is split because many of us who initially backed the bishops cannot understand why they did not respond to the administration’s olive branch. Many bishops seem to want this fight.
Keep in mind that a majority of Catholic voters side with President Obama in this battle, so it's not entirely clear whose religious freedom the Catholic bishops are defending. As usual, it's also not clear who the Catholic bishops represent, other than the Republican party. Read the rest of this post...

Catholic school would rather kill kids' insurance than comply with Obama rules



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
This is par for the course with the Catholic church.  Why choose Option A when you can choose Option B and hurt someone vulnerable at the same time.

It's the way the Catholic church has mishandled the pedophilia scandal (putting children last), it's the way they're handling compliance with non-discrimination laws in DC, Illinois and Massachusetts (rather than simply not discriminate, the Catholics have chosen to stop helping parentless kids all together), and it's the way the church is handling this latest controversy (even though most Catholics agree with Obama and not the church - who does the church leadership actually represent in America, anyone?).

When in doubt, hurt the innocent.  That's the golden rule if you're the Catholic church.

Oh yeah, and the second golden rule is do whatever you can in an election year to get a Republican elected.  It won't be long now until we heard of Catholic parishes refuses to given communion to Democrats.  Every four years it starts like clockwork. Read the rest of this post...

Catholic Bishops now bullying Girl Scouts over religious orthodoxy



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
All you need to know:
It's the old old story — homophobic, misogynistic, often-closeted men acting out a hatred of women, at taxpayer expense.

The sad Catholic tale, from Yahoo News (my emphasis):
[T]he Girl Scouts of the USA are now facing their highest-level challenge yet: An official inquiry by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

At issue are concerns about program materials that some Catholics find offensive, as well as assertions that the Scouts associate with other groups espousing stances that conflict with church teaching. The Scouts, who have numerous parish-sponsored troops, deny many of the claims and defend their alliances.

The inquiry coincides with the Scouts' 100th anniversary celebrations and follows a chain of other controversies.
I cut out Yahoo's church-justifying intro phrase; feel free to click and read it for yourself. But if you do, ask yourself if that phrase, coming first, doesn't lay down some ground cover for the Bishops. (How to read the press, folks; it's not that hard.)

Note that organization — U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. This isn't all bishops, but a conservative-captured and highly influential "professional association" akin to the AMA. Capturing these organizations, then propagandizing through them, is how conservatives work. The phrase for this is "cadre coup".

The writer cycles through the Bishop's complaints — some new, some old, some non-existent (Girl Scouts have never partnered with the evil Planned Parenthood, for example). And the organization says it will modify some of its material to conform to the Catholic Bishop's narrow orthodoxy (though their phrasing is different, something about "easing apprehensions").

Still, that may not be enough:
"I know we're a big part of the culture wars," said the Girl Scouts' spokeswoman, Michelle Tompkins. "People use our good name to advance their own agenda." "For us, there's an overarching sadness to it," Tompkins added. "We're just trying to further girls' leadership."

With the bishops now getting involved, the stakes are high. The Girl Scouts estimate that one-fourth of their 2.3 million youth members are Catholic, and any significant exodus would be a blow given that membership already is down from a peak of more than 3 million several decades ago.
Did I say "may" not be enough? Make that "will" not be enough. These are take-no-prisoners conservatives, and there's blood in the air. The Girl Scouts have given an inch; bad move in my estimation. Again, these are guys who put their nuns (average age, 74) into receivership.

Digby has more.

My solution is simple, by the way. Tax them. Then they can electioneer all they want without the free ride on my dime.

GP

To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius
  Read the rest of this post...

Are Americans in the Vatican – including disgraced Cardinal Law – behind the Nuns Crackdown?



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
As Joe reported here, the Vatican has opened a new front on the war against women with a crackdown of the largest and most influential organization of nuns in the U.S., the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR).

From Joe's story, quoting the NY Times (please click to get the full picture):
The Vatican has appointed an American bishop to rein in the largest and most influential group of Catholic nuns in the United States, saying that an investigation found that the group had “serious doctrinal problems.”

The Vatican’s assessment, issued on Wednesday, said that members of the group, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, had challenged church teaching on homosexuality and the male-only priesthood, and promoted “radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith.”

The sisters were also reprimanded for making public statements that “disagree with or challenge the bishops, who are the church’s authentic teachers of faith and morals.” ... Word of the Vatican’s action took the group completely by surprise, Sister Sanders said.
That's the background. Now comes news of who's running this Vatican operation — a bunch of American priests, possibly including disgraced Boston Cardinal Bernard Law (my emphasis and [bracketed notes]):
When the Vatican last month announced a doctrinal crackdown on the leadership organization representing most of the 57,000 nuns in the U.S. [see above], the sisters said they were “stunned” by the move. Many American Catholics, meanwhile, were angry at what they saw as Rome bullying women whose lives of service have endeared them to the public. ...

[I]t turns out that conservative American churchmen living in Rome—including disgraced former Boston Cardinal Bernard Law—were key players in pushing the hostile takeover of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, or LCWR, which they have long viewed with suspicion for emphasizing social justice work over loyalty to the hierarchy and issues like abortion and gay marriage.

Vatican observers in Rome and church sources in the U.S. say Law was “the person in Rome most forcefully supporting” the LCWR investigation, as Rome correspondent Robert Mickens wrote in The Tablet, a London-based Catholic weekly. Law was the “prime instigator,” in the words of one American churchman, of the investigation that began in 2009 and ended in 2011. The actual crackdown was only launched in April.
Also named in the story are Cardinal Raymond Burke, former archbishop of St. Louis; Cardinal William Levada, a former archbishop of San Francisco; and Cardinal James Stafford, a former Denver archbishop.

Conservatives all. Levada has Ratzinger's old job as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "the Vatican’s powerful doctrinal watchdog."

At issue is not just the fact that Bernard Law and Raymond Burke were given "asylum" in Rome after being driven out of the U.S. in the wake of the child abuse scandal. It's that the Vatican dragged its feet to protect its priests while putting its female community into receivership:
“American Catholics have not forgotten how long it took bishops to wake up to the sexual-abuse crisis they created. And now they see that the Vatican took just three years to determine that it had no other option but to put 80 percent of U.S. nuns — whose average age is 74 — into receivership, an effort led in part by Cardinal Bernard Law,” Grant Gallicho, an associate editor of Commonweal, a liberal Catholic periodical, wrote on the magazine’s blog.
The average age of nuns in the U.S. is ... 74 years old? Man, do these guys owe them.

Is it safe to say that, like all troglodytes, these males hate women? Is it safe to say that if this weren't a "church," most of these types would be serving time for sexual abuse of minors in prisons around the world? I would say Yes on all counts.

The good news? There really are good Catholics — Catholics who are also actually good — Fr. Daniel Berrigan types, who live and breathe under the Bush-like dictatorship of the conservatives who control their organization.

What do you call a religious leader who loves power more than doing right? Not-religious.

GP

(To follow on Twitter or to send links: @Gaius_Publius)
  Read the rest of this post...

Please thank the Catholic church for throwing the US election to Obama



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It's that time, every four years, when the Catholic leadership tries to throw the US elections to the Republicans.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called for two weeks of public protest in June and July against what it sees as growing government encroachment on religious freedom.

The protests are expected to include priests and nuns and thousands of Catholic parishioners. Some activists expect civil disobedience, which could lead to powerful images of priests and nuns being led away in hand restraints.
Can't be long now until they start cutting off communion to Democrats.

I always get a kick out of two things when the Catholic leadership tries to influence US elections on behalf of Republicans.

1. That the Catholic leadership actually acts as if it still has any moral authority whatsoever after aiding and abetting, and continuing to cover up, the decades-long serial rape of children; and

2. That it pretends to represent some huge Catholic constituency when it views don't even represent a majority of US Catholics.  Meaning, if you want to do the bidding of American Catholics, watch these people protest then do the opposite of what they're asking for.
Key findings from the [PPP] survey include:

-57% of Catholic voters support the new policy President Obama announced yesterday allowing women who work for religiously-affiliated hospitals and universities to receive coverage for prescription birth control without requiring Catholic institutions to pay for the coverage directly. Only 29% oppose the policy because they believe it still goes too far in requiring birth control coverage; additionally 5% oppose it because they think Catholic hospitals and universities should be required to pay for this coverage. Catholic women are particularly positive toward the policy, with 59% of them expressing support.

-With the inclusion of President Obama’s solution for religiously-affiliated institutions, Catholics favor the requirement that health plans cover prescription birth control by a  margin of 54% to 42%. Catholic Democrats (80% - 17%) favor the requirement by virtually the same margin that Catholic Republicans (16% - 79%) oppose it; significantly, politically independent Catholics favor the requirement by an 18-point margin (56% to 38%). Catholic women also favor it by an 18-point margin, while Catholic men favor it by a 4-point margin.
But even better?  The more the fringe Catholic leadership rabble-rouses on this issue, the more it actually hurts Romney, according to PPP:
-This issue has the potential to cause Mitt Romney trouble with Catholic voters in the fall. 51% say they side with Barack Obama on this issue, while only 38% prefer
Romney’s position. Hispanic Catholics, a group Romney must make in roads with, go with Obama 59/32 on the policy and Catholic women do so by a 54/35 margin. Catholics ave been a key swing voting group in recent elections, supporting George W. Bush in 2004  and then Obama in 2008. Obama’s even-handed approach on this issue has him positioned  well with Catholics for the fall.
And it may just throw control of the US House to Democrats, again from PPP:
-Congressional Republicans risk losing their majority in the House and squandering any opportunities in the Senate by continuing attacks on the popular birth control benefit.
The trick here for the Obama administration, and campaign, is to make sure that any stories about the Catholic protests explain WHY people are protesting - namely, the Obama birth control benefit policy that most Catholics agree with.

As for the protests themselves, someone needs to counter-protest with a group of five year old boys holding signs saying "you lost your moral authority when you covered up my rape." The only way to chasten the Catholic leadership is for them to know that every single time they try to force all Americans to live under Catholic doctrine Americans will be reminded that these are the same people who to this day still protect child rapists. Read the rest of this post...