comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: "A simple internet search" would have disproved the 16 word claim of Iraq nukes
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

"A simple internet search" would have disproved the 16 word claim of Iraq nukes



| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

The Washington Post examines the history of the fake documents that helped lead us in to war. The infamous 16 words about Iraq's nuclear ambitions were easily proved to be false, if anyone in the Bush administration wanted to do that. Just keep this in mind every time Bush talks about the Iraq war because we really can't trust a thing he says:

In February 2002, the CIA received the verbatim text of one of the documents, filled with errors easily identifiable through a simple Internet search, the interviews show. Many low- and mid-level intelligence officials were already skeptical that Iraq was in pursuit of nuclear weapons.

The interviews also showed that France, berated by the Bush administration for opposing the Iraq war, honored a U.S. intelligence request to investigate the uranium claim. It determined that its former colony had not sold uranium to Iraq.

Burba, who had no special expertise in Africa or nuclear technology, was able to quickly unravel the fraud. Yet the claims clung to life within the Bush administration for months, eventually finding their way into the State of the Union address.

As a result of the CIA's failure to firmly discredit the document text it received in February 2002, former U.S. ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV was called in to investigate the claim. That decision eventually led to the special counsel's investigation that exposed inner workings of the White House and ended with the criminal conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who was forced to resign as chief of staff to Vice President Cheney.
But we're supposed to trust Bush now. Sure.


blog comments powered by Disqus