Ah, the courage that is Democrats. Brings a tear to my eye.
Sure Reid critiqued Clarence Thomas, then turned around and said he'd support Scalia. We call that wimping out in DC speak. Beat up on Clarence Thomas to appease your base, then stab them in the back by endorsing Scalia EVEN BEFORE HE'S BEEN NOMINATED.
I was among those who worried that Reid was going to be a DINO (Democrat in name only), and he's living up to our expectations.
As for Scalia, it's time someone started a campaign demanding Scalia explain what he meant in his now-famous Lawrence v. Texas dissent when bemoaned the fact that states would no longer be able to regulate masturbation. I want to know why Antonin Scalia wants the government to regulate masturbation. And in what way? Frequency? Handedness? Style, technique? Or should only heterosexual married people be able to masturbate, and only then when they plan to procreate? And how's he feel about inter-racial mutual masturbation? Just asking.
I'm quite serious. A little money and we'd have a very fun campaign demanding the press investigate, and Scalia answer, the question as to what exactly he thinks the government role is in masturbation. Imagine signaling that up front - then see if Bush nominates him.
Time to expose the family values hypocrites for the wackos they really are. Does any Democrat, any funder, any organization, have the balls to do it? To fund it?
Sigh.
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff
Follow @americablog
Senate Dem Leader Harry Reid will support Antonin "Just Say No to Masturbation" Scalia as chief justice
blog comments powered by Disqus