comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: Fascinating footnote 48
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Fascinating footnote 48



| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

My friend, gay journalist Rex Wockner, noticed the following in footnote 48 of the Prop 8 decision:

48 We have no occasion in this case to determine whether same-sex couples who were lawfully married in another jurisdiction prior to the adoption of Proposition 8, but whose marriages were not formally recognized in California prior to that date, are entitled to have their marriages recognized in California at this time. None of the petitioners before us in these cases falls within this category, and in the absence of briefing by a party or parties whose rights would be affected by such a determination, we conclude it would be inappropriate to address that issue in these proceedings.


blog comments powered by Disqus