That would be AP's Liz "The Donut" Sidoti.
She just wrote an article claiming that sure McCain is being mean, but Obama is being mean too. Uh, hmm. That's interesting. So Obama says McCain is part of the problem in Washington, and McCain says that Obama is a traitor who wants America to lose the war in Iraq, and to Sidoti those are equivalent because they're both "negative." Yes, to a child, a moron, or someone who shouldn't be in journalism those are the same things because they're both negative. Very good. But to people who progressed beyond Sesame Street, there's a thing called nuance. Or hell, in this case, we're not even into nuance. Obama says McCain won't solve the energy crisis and McCain says Obama is a traitor, and that's equivalent? Okay, sorry, we're clearly speaking to children here. So we'll use small words and say this slowly. We're not upset with John McCain because he's an angry negative man. We're upset with him because he questioned our candidate's and our patriotism. That's a donut of a different color.
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Liz "Sprinkes" Sidoti pens a massive defense of John McCain
More posts about:
media bias
blog comments powered by Disqus