comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: The battle over "war on terror"
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

The battle over "war on terror"



| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

The Bush team loves to use the phrase, but then again, how often are they actually correct? Axis of Evil? Meanwhile, Blair has not been as enthusiastic about the phrase but he is still reluctant to cast it aside, perhaps out of fear of raising any discussion related to his own failures in the disastrous campaigns.

Mr Benn risked a diplomatic rift by lecturing the White House about the need to develop a more intelligent response to the challenges posed by terrorism. He said relying entirely on "hard power" - military force or economic measures - would not work. What was needed, he said, was "soft power" - listening and finding common ground on values and ideas. Mr Benn said: "In the UK, we do not use the phrase 'war on terror' because we can't win by military means alone and because this isn't us against one organised enemy with a clear identity and a coherent set of objectives. It is the vast majority of the people in the world ... against a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups who have relatively little in common apart from their identification with others who share their distorted view of the world. By letting them feel part of something bigger, we give them strength." He said later: "Words do count and that is why, since this is not something we can overcome by military means alone, we need to find other ways of describing what the challenge is."


blog comments powered by Disqus