In diplomacy, intent matters

Sane foreign policy officials and observers often support diplomacy and negotiation even in the face of apparently intractable problems. We negotiate with our allies, our adversaries, and even our enemies because the opportunity to solve problems by a combination of political carrots and sticks is very often better than the alternatives. Whereas diplomacy can benefit multiple sides, or at least allow for saving face, even winning a war frequently involves heavy costs. Finding a middle ground doesn't necessarily make you feel great -- as Calvin once said (the cartoon, of course, not the theologian), "A good compromise leaves everybody mad" -- but again, often better than the alternatives. Politics is the art of the possible.

But successful diplomacy requires good faith. Talking is not enough; a nation must have trust to be effective, and trust (or lack thereof) can be dependent on its leader or governing administration. Right now, other nations are, understandably, worried about ending up like poor Satchel here, in a classic strip of one of the greatest comics ever.

On a related note, I'm very curious to see the result of all this North Korea talk.