If Republicans retain Congress in November, Bush advisers note, he could assert that for the third straight election, the party defied historical patterns and popular predictions. Bush, they said, could advance a fresh agenda in early 2007.So, now the Republicans have spun the press that as long as they retain control of US House, that means a mandate for Bush to go wild in 2007. Forget the fact that Bush is the most hated and incompetent president in decades, and he's still in pissing range of all-time most hated.
So if the Republicans lose the House does that mean it's a mandate for Bush to resign?
