Per the Washington Post's logic, this Newsweek poll shows that 50% of the American people are unhappy with Republicans leading Congress, and the Post teaches us that only the liberal base of the Democratic party is unhappy with Republicans, so 50% of the American people must be the liberal base of the Democratic party.
Oh, what a sad marginalized lot we are:
Both houses of Congress are now controlled by the Republicans, but public opinion now favors a Democratic takeover this November by a margin of 50 percent to 34 percent. Among Independents, the Democrats are preferred by more than a two-to-one margin: 51 percent to 22 percent.And on censure, we find the same thing - nearly half the American people are part of the liberal base of the Democratic party:
Four in 10 (42 percent) of the adults in the general public say they would support Congressional censure of the president, while half (50 percent) say they would not. CensureAnd even just amongst Democrats, the "liberal base of the party" seems to be actually half the entire party:
Among Democrats, almost half (49 percent) support impeachmentIs that possible that the "base" of the party can be actually "half" the party? That would be the majority of the party, not the base, no?
And finally, we find out that actually 65% of the American people are the liberal base of the Democratic party.
only 29 percent of the people questioned approved Bush?s handling of the situation in Iraq. Fully 65 percent disapprove.I bring all of this up to make a simple point. The Washington Post and the New York Times are lazy, and the Post in particular will do anything to shill for the Bush administration. Because the traditional media can't quite internalize the fact that their favorite president is an abysmal failure, and roundly deplored by 65% of the American people, they need to keep marginalizing Bush's critics as a somewhat kooky hysterical fringe minority. It's the only way the traditional media can avoid having to come to terms with the fact that they are still whoring for a failed presidency while the rest of the country has finally woken up.
So, the next time the Washington Post and the New York Times calls liberal blogs the "liberal base of the Democratic party," they need to start explaining how our views, AMERICAblog's in particular, differ so drastically the mainstream views of the nation at large, let alone the mainstream views of the Democratic party.
Then again, the Washington Post still thinks Iran is behind the IEDs in Iraq, so don't hold your breath for them to catch on any time soon about the fact that most of the country has turned against Bush.