comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: Is Woodward going to lie again on Larry King, Monday at 9pm Eastern?
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Is Woodward going to lie again on Larry King, Monday at 9pm Eastern?



| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

You know Woodward is in trouble if he's going on Larry King to do his mea culpa (he'll be on tomorrow, Monday, at 9pm Eastern on CNN). Larry King is where you go if you've really screwed up and don't have the balls to go do a real interview with a real journalist who might ask you difficult questions.

So, let's have a little contest. I want folks to count how many times Woodward either lies, or refuses to tell the whole truth, Monday night. Among the key Woodard lies to look out for:

  • Woodward says he didn't tell his editor that he was one of the reporters who had been leaked Valerie Plames name and CIA status because he was afraid of Patrick Fitzgerald, afraid of being jailed, afraid of being subpoenaed. Woodward was leaked the Plame info in June 2003. Fitzgerald wasn't hired until December 2003. So his fear of Fitzgerald doesn't explain why he didn't tell his editor about the leak from June to December when Fitzgerald didn't even exist.

  • Woodward says journalists were getting subpoenaed and that scared him. Well, journalists weren't getting subpoenaed until May of 2004. So what's Woodward's excuse for not coming clean to his editors from June 2003 until May 2004?

  • Woodward claims he told Post colleague Walter Pincus about the leak. But why would Woodward tell Pincus if he was afraid of being subpoenaed, and thus wouldn't even tell his own editor? Not to mention, Pincus says this is absolutely untrue, Woodward never told him anything. So which Washington Post journalist is lying, Pincus or Woodward?

  • If Woodward was so afraid of Fitzgerald, then why did Woodward publicly take Fitzgerald on for two years? Hardly the moves of someone who's mortally afraid of catching Fitzgerald's interest.

  • If Woodward was afraid of being jailed, then why did he offer, this past July on Larry King, to be jailed instead of Judith Miller? And if he no longer was afraid to be jailed or targeted by Fitzgerald at that point, then why didn't he come clean to his editor then?

  • Woodward would like us to believe that he, the guy who kept Deep Throat's identity secret for over three decades, the guy who took down Richard Nixon of all people, was now mortally afraid of some government bureaucrat trying to force him to divulge a source?
If the Washington Post thinks we're going to give up on this story, they have another thing coming. Remember gang, we're live blogging the Larry King show tomorrow at 9pm. We're going to count every single lie, half-truth, and sin of ommission that Woodward commits.


blog comments powered by Disqus