The second story in as many weeks suggesting it's all Clinton's fault for not killing Bin Laden. Here's the analysis Clinton received:
"...[Bin Laden's] prolonged stay in Afghanistan - where hundreds of 'Arab mujahedeen' receive terrorist training and key extremist leaders often congregate - could prove more dangerous to U.S. interests in the long run than his three-year liaison with Khartoum," in Sudan.Good, solid analysis. But when it comes to smoking guns, that doesn't even begin to compare to:
BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK INSIDE THE UNITED STATESOr we could blame Reagan for training and arming Bin Laden in the first place. But keep trying, far right. Maybe we'll all forget the worst terrorist attack in US history happened on Bush's watch and he responded by failing to catch Bin Laden and then invading a country that had nothing to do with it. Then again, maybe we won't forget.
