AMERICAblog.com

Visit our stores
here and here

You are NOT on the AMERICAblog home page
click here to go there!

Check to have links open new windows
Send me your tips: americablog@starpower.net




Thursday, June 02, 2005
Bush's "Snowflake" adoption program discriminates on basis of religion, sexual orientation

· 6/02/2005 10:20:00 AM ET · Link 
Make a comment · reddit · FARK · Digg It!  · Stumble It!


I'm sorry, but how is it legal that this adoption program discriminates on the basis of religion? (Read the excerpt from the NYT article below.)

It's disgusting that they allow anti-gay discrimination too, of course, but religious discrimination is in the civil rights act. And this is not a church, it's an adoption agency. So how do they permit discrimination? Do they permit discrimination based on race too? You know, in case I don't want any of those dark folks adopting my sperm child. And would a court of law be forced to endorse religious or race based discrimination if the adoption agency refused to follow through on the donors racist or bigoted views?
Couples adopting or donating Snowflakes embryos are mostly Christian, and most embryo donors are white, Ms. Maze said. Some families are Roman Catholic, even though the church has historically opposed in vitro fertilization.

Couples must agree to adoption-like procedures: receiving families are screened and must undergo counseling, and Snowflakes allows donating and receiving families to designate criteria for each other, meet and maintain contact after birth. Adopting couples must agree not to abort any embryos.

Those conditions were fine with Bob and Angie Deacon of Virginia Beach, Va., who donated their 13 embryos after having twins and being discouraged from another pregnancy by a doctor. "With another program, to be honest with you, they could have been adopted by lesbian parents, and I'm totally against that," said Mr. Deacon, 35.

It took two and a half years to bring themselves to fill out the papers. On their forms, they said the adopting family must be conservative Christians and, ideally, include a stay-at-home mother.
Law or no law, these people were at the White House. AT THE WHITE HOUSE, at the invitation of the president. The president wanted this to be THE MODEL for the country - religious-based (and who knows, race-based?) discrimination as the model for the entire country.

So again, I ask the question - do they permit discrimination based on race? Against Latinos? Blacks? Irish? Muslims?

PS And how did the NYT totally miss this incredible aspect of their own story? Did NO editor read this and go "holy shit"? No follow up with the Snowflake folks about the legality of doing this, the morality of doing this, and whether they permit discrimination in other categories?


You are NOT on the AMERICAblog home page, 
click here to read more posts about US Politics

















News sites:
- Washington Post
- NYT
- AP Politics
- Reuters Politics
- Editor & Publisher
- Rasmussen Polls
- Time
- Newsweek
- Roll Call
- The Hill

- ABCNews
- Bloomberg Politics
- Boston Globe
- CBS News
- Chicago Sun-Times
- Chicago Tribune
- Christian Science Monitor
- CNN
- Congressional Quarterly
- Dallas Morning News
- Dow Jones
- Houston Chronicle
- Los Angeles Times
- McClatchy
- Miami Herald
- NBC News
- NY Daily News
- New Republic
- NY Daily News blog
- NYT listing of blogs
- New Yorker
- NPR
- Philly Daily News
- Philly Inquirer
- SF Chronicle
- USA Today
- Vanity Fair
- Village Voice

Foreign
- Agence France-Presse
- Al Jazeera
- Asia Times
- BBC
- Der Spiegel (Germany, in English)
- Economist
- Financial Times
- Guardian (UK)
- Haaretz (Israel)
- Independent (UK)
- International Herald Tribune
- Jerusalem Post
- Le Monde (in French)
- Le Monde Diplomatique (in English)
- Times of India
- Times of London
- Yahoo, World News (in French)
- Yahoo, Latin American News (in Spanish)

Opinion
- Jonathan Alter
- Eric Boehlert
- Eleanor Clift
- Joe Conason
- E.J. Dionne, Jr.
- Maureen Dowd
- Dan Froomkin
- Mark Morford
- Frank Rich
- Helen Thomas

Political Cartoons
- Daryl Cagle
- Jeff Danziger
- Doonesbury
- Mark Fiore
- Mike Luckovich
- Pat Oliphant
- Ted Rall
- Tom Toles

Gossip
- Defamer
- Gawker
- Liz Smith
- Page Six
- Perez Hilton
- Reliable Source (Wash Post)
- Wonkette
- Yahoo Celebrity News


Donate to
AMERICAblog Candidates
Scott Kleeb (NE-Senate)
Tom Allen (ME-Senate)
Rick Noriega (TX-Senate)



AMERICAblog on Facebook

Buy an ad on all the top liberal blogs at once, over 2 million page views daily, here.

The anti-spam service I use and recommend:






Give to AMERICAblog

One-time donation
$
Recurring monthly donation
$
Donations are not tax-deductible.

Why AMERICAblog?
Because at some point you tire of the lies.

What issues do you cover?
US politics overall with a particular focus on the Bush Administration, the radical right, and civil rights.

Who are you?
John Aravosis
Editor
Washington, DC

Joe Sudbay
Deputy Editor
Washington, DC

Chris Ryan
Associate Editor
Paris, France

Robert Arena
Contributing Editor
Baltimore, Maryland

Jacki Schechner
Contributing Editor
Washington, DC

Copyright 2008 - John Aravosis