Good God, Tucker. I gave you more credit than this.
This is the only real question Carlson asks. Then check out GG's answer:
Carlson: Jeff Gannon.com your website is owned by the same person or company that owns a couple of websites with pornographic sounding nargese military stud.com or whatever got a lot of press. I'm not going to ask about those sites beyond what they apparently are. Here's my question. Isn't it obvious to you that that's sort of discrediting in the eyes of a lot of other people? Why would you have any tie at all, if you want to be a mainstream journalist or -- regardless, a legitimate journalist, to websites with names like that?Really JeffJames? MilitaryEscortsM4M. So, these weren't URLs for military-type prostitutes for gay men? What were they? Walk-me-home-at-night services offered by off-duty military personnel for gay men afraid to cut through a dangerous neighborhood all alone on foot on their way home from the bars?
Gannon: First of all, people misunderstand what those names represented. They're just website names, domain names. Years ago I was doing website development and these names were reserved for a private client. They were never hosted. Nothing was ever on them. And as we know on the internet, things never disappear. These are all things that are from a long time ago that people have dug up just to destroy my credibility and damage my reputation.
And as for "And as we know on the internet, things never disappear," your last client that we know of was 3 months before you stepped foot in the White House. Yeah, real long time ago.
Carlson is a shill. He shouldn't have a show on PBS unless he's going to act like a real journalist. He's clearly going to make this CrossFire without the crossfire. It's his own personal right-wing puff show, care of PBS. More reverse liberal guilt from the "liberal" media, trying so hard to be fair they're now conservative.
And this:
Carlson: You've got a quote in your website that struck me. You said for decades gay difficultists have insisted that government stay out of the bedroom. Now we know they didn't want anyone in their way when they invaded the bedroom. To them, it's a one way street and a principles to -- principle to be easily abandoned when it doesn't suit your agenda. I understand people -- the implications, because may be gay, that you shouldn't have access to the White House.Very simple answer. Get used to it. You guys and your party declared war on us. Now we're fighting back. Don't like it? Call it off.
Gannon: The hypocrisy is stunning. If I were -- hypocrisy is stunning. Because I'm a conservative, it seems to be that there are no rules and we can -- those people can leave their principles behind about personal privacy and sex doesn't matter and diversity and inclusion. They can leave all those things behind if it's useful to attack a conservative.
Oh, and one more thing about your "past," Jeff. Who updated your military prostitution Web addresses this past November, 2 months before we wrote out story about you? According to the public records, someone updated the records on those addresses just a few months ago - and the only person who can do that is someone who owns those addresses or works with them. Was that you? Hope not, because then you'd be lying again to yet another real journalist. And oh yeah, Web addresses have to paid for every year or so, depending on how you registered them. When is the last time you paid to keep the registration on militaryescortsm4m.com? I sure hope it was BEFORE you stepped foot in the White House, otherwise, AGAIN, you'd be lying by saying this was all stuff in your past.
