Ok, color me confused. GG keeps doing softball interviews where he keeps trying to mislead people about his past and present. The problem is, what he's saying just doesn't add up. Fortunately for him, he's been interviewing with slaps like Tucker Carlson.
GG to the NYT:
He quit his job at GOPUSA/Talon News last month, although in the Times interview he reveals that it was not much of a paying gig, as he only “received a kind of stipend.”GG to Tucker Carlson:
I don't ask anybody to be responsible for -- for my past, for personal issues, anything that I've done prior to this. And I wouldn't ask anybody to defend those things. That's my responsibility. I will do that at some point in time when I'm able to clear the air and counter some -- some of this very inaccurate information that's out.Ok, so now I'm confused.
1. You worked in Washington, DC, one of the most expensive cities in America, for what you yourself call next to nothing.
2. You say you're not whoring anymore. Tthis was all your "past" - and in fact, you imply that you never worked as a prostitute at all, calling all these allegations "very inaccurate information." This, even though numerous Web sites selling you as a prostitute were still online up until the story broke last month, and even though someone updated the record for your militaryescortsm4m.com URL just last November (a few months ago), a URL that you say has been misinterpreted, even though it's not clear to anyone what other interpreation one could have from that URL other than male prostitution.
3. We know that you're in default on $20,000 owed to the state of Delaware in back taxes, so it's not like you're independetly wealthy or have any great nest egg of money to support yourself in an expensive city without any other income.
4. So how exactly did you live in DC for the past 2 years on relatively no income? Even a studio apartment in this city on Capitol Hill, where you live, can go easily for $1000 a month. Groceries are expensive. Taxes are high. Where exactly did you get your money from, since you pretty clearly imply you weren't working as a prostitute?
Just asking because you're still clearly trying to convince every interviewer who talks to you that you weren't working as a whore, ever, when all the evidence says you have.
You keep saying these were just nude photos of you, when in fact they were entire Web sites where you were selling yourself for $200 an hour and $1200 a weekend as a gay hooker.
We even have lengthy reviews from satisfied customers, and they're STILL LIVE ON THE INTERNET. Yet you still tell every interviewer that there's lots of disinformation out there about you. If you weren't a hooker, then say so. And if you were, then it was your business, and a crime, and hardly a private personal bedroom issue.
But let's for a moment assume your insinuations are correct, and you weren't working as a hooker up until 3 months before you stepped foot into the White House, like your most recent client on record has said, and all of this "very inaccurate information" is wrong. Then how did you afford to live in DC the past two years on no income?
If you're going to keep doing these interviews, and the mainstream media like Tucker Carlson, and apparently the New York Times (we'll find out tomorrow), are going to refuse to do their job, and instead they let you roll right over them with, at best, half-truths and Clintonian deflections ABOUT SOMETHING THAT'S A CRIME, then we deserve to finally get a straight answer out of you.
Were you running a criminal enterprise 3 months before you entered the White House and/or while you were given regular access to the White House and even access to the president? And if you don't think that someone running a criminal enterprise, and who apparently is now desperately trying to hide that fact, isn't a security risk, then please explain WHY they're not a security risk. Because in the world of security risks, a guy trying to hide evidence of an embarrassing criminal past or present is about as risky as you get.
