comsc US Politics | AMERICAblog News: The CIA hates Bush
Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

The CIA hates Bush



| Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

Join the club.

From Novak, who once again seems to be suggesting at the end of the story that no one in DC should dare ever approach a reporter in confidence. Let's hope Novak's sources take note.

A few hours after George W. Bush dismissed a pessimistic CIA report on Iraq as ''just guessing,'' the analyst who identified himself as its author told a private dinner last week of secret, unheeded warnings years ago about going to war in Iraq. This exchange leads to the unavoidable conclusion that the president of the United States and the Central Intelligence Agency are at war with each other.

Paul R. Pillar, the CIA's national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, sat down Tuesday night in a large West Coast city with a select group of private citizens. He was not talking off the cuff. Relying on a multi-paged, single-spaced memorandum, Pillar said he and his colleagues concluded early in the Bush administration that military intervention in Iraq would intensify anti-American hostility throughout Islam. This was not from a CIA retiree but an active senior official. (Pillar, no covert operative, is listed openly in the Federal Staff Directory.)

For President Bush to publicly write off a CIA paper as just guessing is without precedent....

Pillar told him that the fact I knew his name meant somebody had violated the off-the-record nature of his remarks. In other words, the CIA bureaucracy wants a license to criticize the president and the former DCI without being held accountable.
Yeah, the CIA bureaucracy wants a license to talk to reporters off-the-record in order to slip them information? Oh my God. I'm glad that Bob Novak has never used information given him by an un-named source. Oops...


blog comments powered by Disqus