UPDATE: Reuters got the story right, AP did not.
Holy shit. The fundies are going to be PISSED. Not that this surprises me, content-wise. It was clear that Cheney was going along with this amendment nonsense because Bush wanted to do it. But still, for Cheney to come out and pretty much say that Bush made him do it (note the repeated references to "he"), that's a bit surprising. Especially one week before the GOP Convention. This undercuts the federal amendment badly, especially when the fundies are again agitating for a House vote on the amendment around the week of September 20. That vote is assured to be a disaster after Cheney's comments today.
Two points to Dick Cheney for sticking up for his gay kid. And two points to all of us who said it was worth targeting him on this issue - he finally came out and did the right thing. :-)
CHENEY DOES NOT SUPPORT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Acknowledges 'gay' daughter
by Rex Wockner
Speaking in Davenport, Iowa, Aug. 24, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney made it clear he does not support President George W. Bush's drive to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
Cheney's lesbian daughter, Mary, was in the audience as he spoke. She is director of vice-presidential operations for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign.
Cheney was asked: "I need to know, Sir, from your heart -- I don't want to know what your advisers think or even your top adviser -- I need to know, what do you think about homosexual marriages?"
The vice president replied: "Well, the question has come up in the past with respect to the question of gay marriage. Lynne and I have a gay daughter so it's an issue that our family is very familiar with. We have two daughters and we have enormous pride in both of them, they're both fine young women and they do a superb job, frankly, of supporting us, and we were blessed with both our daughters.
"With respect to the question of [unintelligible word] relationships, my general view is that freedom means freedom for everybody. People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to. The question that comes up with respect to the issue of marriage is, what kind of official sanction or approval is going to be granted by government, if you will, to the particular relationship?
"Historically," Cheney said, "that's been a relationship that's been handled by the states. States have made the basic fundamental decision what constitutes a marriage. I made clear four years ago when this question came up in my debate with Joe Lieberman that my view was that that's appropriately a matter for the states to decide and that's how it ought to best be handled.
"The president has, as a result of the decisions made in Massachusetts this year by judges, felt that he wanted to support a constitutional amendment to define at the federal level what constitutes marriage, that his perception was that the courts in effect were beginning to change without the people being involved, without their being part of the political process -- that the courts, in this case a court in Massachusetts, were making the judgment or the decision for the entire country, and he disagreed with that. So where we're at at this point is, he's come out in support of a federal constitutional amendment and I don't think that, so far, it hasn't had the votes to pass.
"There is the federal Defense of Marriage Act that passed in 1996 and, to date, it has not been successfully challenged in the court, and it may be sufficient to resolve the issue," Cheney said. "At this point my own preference is as I've stated, but the president makes basic policy for this administration and he's made it clear that he does in fact support an amendment on this issue."
